Unveiling the Legal Labyrinth: Soering v. the United Kingdom (1989) and Article 3 of the ECHR 1950

In the late 1980s, a case of international legal significance was brought before the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) concerning the rights of citizens of the European Union (EU) under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) 1950. The case in question, Soering v. the United Kingdom (1989) concerned Articles 3, 6 and 13 of the ECHR 1950 and the potential extradition to the USA by the UK of a West German national to face trial in Virginia, USA on a murder charge. Soering argued that if he were found guilty of murder and sentenced to death, that he would experience ‘death row-phenomenon’ which would lead to the violation of his Convention rights. In this blog, I will be exploring the case of Soering v. the United Kingdom (1989) and the implications of Article 3 of the ECHR 1950.

Introduction to Soering v. the United Kingdom (1989)

Soering v. the United Kingdom (1989) concerned the extradition of a West German national, Jens Soering, to the USA to face trial in Virginia on a murder charge. Soering had been accused of murdering two people in 1985 and had been arrested in the UK in 1986. The UK government had been presented with an extradition request by the USA and was considering whether to accede to it. Soering argued that if he were extradited to the USA, he would be at risk of the death penalty and the death row-phenomenon which would violate his rights under the ECHR 1950.

The case of Soering v. the United Kingdom (1989) marked a turning point in international human rights law as it was the first case to consider the application of the ECHR 1950 to extradition requests and the death penalty. The case was heard by the ECtHR in 1989 and was eventually decided in favour of Soering.

Overview of the ECHR 1950

The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) 1950 is the cornerstone of the human rights protections available to individuals within the European Union (EU). The Convention is made up of a number of articles which set out the rights of individuals and the obligations that states have to respect and protect those rights. The Convention is binding on all member states of the EU and is overseen by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).

The ECHR 1950 contains a number of articles which set out the fundamental rights of individuals, including the right to life (Article 2), the right to a fair trial (Article 6) and the prohibition of torture, inhuman or degrading treatment (Article 3). The Convention also contains provisions which allow individuals to bring complaints of violations of their rights before the ECtHR.

Article 3 of the ECHR 1950 and its Application to Soering v. the United Kingdom (1989)

Article 3 of the ECHR 1950 is one of the most important articles of the Convention as it sets out the prohibition of torture, inhuman or degrading treatment. The provision has been interpreted by the ECtHR as meaning that no individual should be subject to treatment which is so extreme that it is considered to be degrading or inhuman.

In Soering v. the United Kingdom (1989), Article 3 of the ECHR 1950 was at the heart of the case. Soering argued that if he were extradited to the USA, he would be at risk of the death penalty and the death row-phenomenon which would violate his rights under Article 3 of the ECHR 1950. The ECtHR had to consider whether the potential death penalty and the death row-phenomenon would constitute torture, inhuman or degrading treatment as prohibited by Article 3 of the ECHR 1950.

The Argument of Soering v. the United Kingdom (1989)

Soering’s argument in Soering v. the United Kingdom (1989) was that if he were extradited to the USA, he would be at risk of the death penalty and the death row-phenomenon which would violate his rights under the ECHR 1950. Soering argued that the death penalty was a form of torture and that the death row-phenomenon – a term used to describe the psychological and physical effects of being on death row – was also a form of inhuman or degrading treatment.

Soering argued that the death penalty violated his right to life and the death row-phenomenon violated his right to freedom from inhuman or degrading treatment under Article 3 of the ECHR 1950. The ECtHR had to consider whether the potential death penalty and the death row-phenomenon would constitute torture, inhuman or degrading treatment as prohibited by Article 3 of the ECHR 1950.

The Judgement of the ECtHR in Soering v. the United Kingdom (1989)

The ECtHR ultimately ruled in favour of Soering and held that if he were extradited to the USA, he would be at risk of the death penalty and the death row-phenomenon which would constitute a violation of his rights under Article 3 of the ECHR 1950. The judgement of the ECtHR in Soering v. the United Kingdom (1989) marked a turning point in international human rights law as it was the first case to consider the application of the ECHR 1950 to extradition requests and the death penalty.

The ECtHR held that the death penalty and the death row-phenomenon did constitute torture, inhuman or degrading treatment as prohibited by Article 3 of the ECHR 1950. The ECtHR also found that the potential extradition of Soering to the USA would violate his rights under Article 6 of the ECHR 1950, which guarantees the right to a fair trial.

Implications of Soering v. the United Kingdom (1989)

The judgement of the ECtHR in Soering v. the United Kingdom (1989) had far-reaching implications for the extradition of individuals from the EU to countries where the death penalty is still in place. After the judgement, the UK government had to take into consideration the potential for a violation of an individual’s rights under Article 3 of the ECHR 1950 before acceding to an extradition request.

The judgement also set a precedent for other cases involving the application of Article 3 of the ECHR 1950. The ECtHR has since applied the judgement in a number of cases involving the death penalty.

Conclusion

Soering v. the United Kingdom (1989) marked an important turning point in international human rights law as it was the first case to consider the application of the ECHR 1950 to extradition requests and the death penalty. The judgement of the ECtHR in Soering v. the United Kingdom (1989) established that the death penalty and the death row-phenomenon constituted torture, inhuman or degrading treatment as prohibited by Article 3 of the ECHR 1950.

The judgement has since been applied in a number of other cases involving the death penalty. The judgement of the ECtHR in Soering v. the United Kingdom (1989) established an important precedent for the protection of the human rights of individuals within the EU and serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding the human rights of all individuals, regardless of nationality or legal status.

If you believe that your rights as an EU citizen have been violated, contact an attorney familiar with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) 1950. They can help you understand the implications of the judgement in Soering v. the United Kingdom (1989) and advise you on the best course of action.

Hits: 2514